My Combined Evaluate on the ABA Ethics Opinion on Responding to Unfavourable Critiques – Thelegaltorts

More than a decade after customers started leaving attorney reviews online, the ABA has now provided Ethical Guidelines for Responding to Online Criticism, Formal Statement 496. As in most countries, the ABA takes the position of a negative customer review not to create the kind of controversy with a customer – like a misconduct lawsuit – that warrants disclosure of confidential customer information as a defense. Therefore, attorneys who disclose client trust in order to respond to online criticism may be subject to disciplinary proceedings.

Comment 496 referred to two jurisdictions that take a slightly different approach. Colorado Formal Opinion 136 (2019) found that if an online review is controversial, attorneys may disclose confidentiality, although they should be wrong on the confidentiality side if unsure. With DC Bar FOrmal Opinion 370 (found here), attorneys can use caution to disclose that customer trust is being defended in response to online comments.

The ABA statement included a list of “best practices” for responding to online criticism. This includes asking them to remove a bad rating, not responding at all to stop triggering negative feedback, or inviting the commenter to contact the attorney to take the conversation offline. The ABA also suggests that attorneys use their professional obligation to maintain confidence as an explanation for limited comment.

Many attorneys have criticized the ABA’s position as an unfair interference with language that could harm attorneys – especially Soli – by rendering them vulnerable to unjustified attack. And although I generally criticize many ethical decisions, I don’t find the ABA statement too burdensome. While the ABA’s recommendation not to get involved is unwise (and contrary to all business advice on responding to reviews), the ABA statement would not prevent attorneys from approving most of Hubspot’s suggested templates for responding to online criticism use.

Even if lawyers can ethically respond to a negative review by unpacking a client’s dirty laundry in public, it may not be the best approach from a business perspective. Imagine a situation where a lawyer accused of being rude and overwhelming a client in a review blames the client for ramping up the bill due to their troubled relationship with their ex. I would view the lawyer as a bully and the lack of discretion in bad taste and would probably not include recommendations. And I think a lot of potential customers would think the same way.

Undoubtedly, negative online reviews can seriously affect a law firm. An online source reports that a single negative review can drive 22 percent of potential customers away. Even a negative review can provide an opportunity to track a customer, as 57 percent of customers review an online company’s response to negative reviews. Lawyers who respond apologetically to online criticism and try to get them to write can overcome the negative effects of online reviews. And such answers are still permissible according to the ABA statement.

Leave a Comment